Blog

Play Video

It’s impossible to turn on the TV or social media without seeing something about COVID-19. I don’t need to go into all the details of how this virus (or perhaps, our response to this virus) has impacted the world. The pharmaceutical companies are scrambling to financially capitalize. The news is doing what it does best: inciting fear and anxiety. As we’ve watched and listened to how the conversations have changed from a water-cooler-concern to completely shutting down the water-cooler experience altogether, there is one thing that is abundantly clear: there is an evident difference between those who whole-heartedly have adopted a “health philosophy” and those who have not. Let me explain.

When your child gets a fever, do you see him as being sick? When they have a runny nose and cough, are you quick to find something to suppress the cough (even if it’s “natural”)? When allergies are bad, do you look for quick relief? If you answered “yes” to any of these questions, it’s likely that the COVID-19 news probably causes a level of fear and anxiety to rise up within you about your health. How does your reaction to the COVID-19 news relate to how you choose to take care of your child’s fever? It’s your health philosophy. 

If one fully understands and lives life based on principle, you recognize the body is designed intelligently and the body always does the right thing at the right time to adapt and heal. Fevers serve a purpose to kill the foreign invader and strengthen the immune system for future events. Many researchers now believe that the allergies have actually evolved to protect us. Runny noses, coughs and itchy rashes keep toxic chemicals out of our bodies and persuade us to steer clear of dangerous environments (see work done by Ruslan Medzhitov, an immunobiologist at Yale University). Take the rats for example. Rats don’t hang out in empty, clean trash cans and dumpsters. Where do they congregate: in dirty environments. Disease doesn’t congregate and grow in healthy bodies. The germ theory of disease that focuses on the pathogen rather than the host leads to chaos.

“Only knowledge of health–the study of health–can give a true knowledge of disease, for disease is handicapped health. Health represents a body and mind adjusted to, and in unison with, the physical laws of nature. Disease represents any departure from this ideal state”–J.H. Tilden, MD  

Even the Father of Modern Medical Pathology, Rudolph Virchow, said at the end of his life,

“If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to providing that germs seek their natural habitat…diseased tissue…rather than being the cause of diseased tissue. Mosquitoes seek the stagnant water. They do NOT cause the pool to become stagnant!”

The foundational principle to the vitalistic paradigm is this: the body is designed to be self-regulating and self-healing. The body needs no help, just no interference. Disease cannot survive in a healthy body. 

Take the bubonic plague for example—the cause of the “black death” that killed around 25 million Europeans in the 14th century. Anthropologists who studied survivors of the plague noted that they each had one thing in common: they all lived well into their 70’s and 80’s. Those who suffered and survived the plague lived longer and much healthier lives than their European counterparts. So for those living in the 14th century, the difference between life and death was very much dependent on the strength or their body, not the intensity of the disease. 

The disease was constant, the host was the biggest variable. The same is true with any disease. If you inoculated an entire room of 100 people with the flu virus, you’d see some people catch the flu and get sick while others didn’t get sick at all. Same bug, same intensity of delivery. The difference: the strength of the host’s immune system, not whether the host is vaccinated against the disease. Certainly this does not mean that healthy people never get sick. It all comes down to whether the body has the ability to adapt intelligently. You can’t artificially trick your body into believing it’s immune. It is impossible to trick your body into health. Health is something you build. Remove interference to your body’s ability to heal and the body will heal from the inside-out. Outside of divine intervention, it happens no other way. 

So whether it’s COVID-19 or Zika or Ebola or a fever, the principle remains the same. Your best defense is a good offense. Strengthen your body from the inside out, remove all sources of interference and focus on building health. And when the rest of the world acts out in fear, you can be confident that you are acting in faith.

Play Video

Are you choosing a life of fear or faith? Are you waiting for the ‘powers that be’ to declare a new normal or are you choosing to design your new normal? This clip was from our Maxliving Makeover, New Year New You in January 2021. Live events are the best! Who’s with me?

Bill Gates says that rich nations should shift to synthetic beef. What are your thoughts?

Play Video

An all new #askdrwilson Show is out now! This week I sit dwon with Sarah Keith to discuss her weight loss story of how she has lost 85 lbs in her 100 lbs journey. 

Visit the link in my bio to watch the full episode!

Wait. The mainstream media (and ‘fact-checkers’) labeled those as ‘conspiracy theorists’ who suggested that the ‘gain of function’ laboratory in WUHAN that was experimenting with coronaviruses should be investigated for a potential ‘lab leak’ of COVID-19. If this would have been entertained instead of dismissed as a ‘conspiracy theory’, imagine how much different our response could have been and the different conversations we would have been having in relation to China. How does that make you feel that these ‘gain of function’ labs are still in operation all over the world?

Be sure not to miss one of the most important events of the year as Stand for Health Freedom presents, “Data Disaster: A Call for an Investigation Into the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19.” The online event, streaming live at 6 p.m. EST, features SHF co-founder Sayer Ji and eight panelists representing voices across the #medical, #scientific, #legal, #educational and policy-making communities. During the two-hour forum, panelists will dive into the collateral damage and real-world consequences of the CDC’s data collection methods, metrics and guidance implemented throughout COVID-19. Topics they will address include:

– From PCR tests to death certificates, how the current emergency has been driven by compromised data.

– Did the CDC engage in willful misconduct?

– How long can a #publichealth emergency last, and has the length of this emergency been justified?

– The costs of a prolonged emergency — from food insecurity and #poverty, to #school closures and suicides.

– How to handle future infectious outbreaks with a focus on #accuracy, #transparency and #equity.

❗️Most important, we will have a special call to action at the end of the event so that you can help hold the CDC #accountable for its conduct over the past year! For more information, sign up for an email reminder, or to watch the event, visit the link in @standforhealthfreedom bio.

Public Health officials and the CDC are using faulty assumptions and unreliable tests to track positive cases and drive the global “pandemic”.

 

The PCR test amplifies the genetic material of the virus prior to testing. The molecular test cannot distinguish between dead and live genetic fragments and hence cannot make out whether the virus is alive or not. The test is only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.The founder of the PCR test, Kary Mullis says that the PCR test should never be used as a tool in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases”.

 

Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics, stated:

“You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it. You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms”

He added, “Every time somebody takes a swab, a tissue sample of their DNA, it goes into a government database. They’re not just looking for the virus.”

Prof Carl Heneghan, researcher and author of a new study that calls the PCR test into question says that he believes the detection of traces of old virus could partly explain why the number of cases is rising while hospital admissions remain stable. 

If the PCR test is only detecting and amplifying fragments of a virus and fragments of a virus is not an indication of infection, why are we recommending wide-spread testing? You don’t have to be a scientist to see this as bizarre, after mass fear of asymptomatic spread caused millions to be shut up in our homes and remains the driving force behind mask mandates and other restrictions that treat all of us as potentially contagious no matter how healthy we feel. As Dr. Marc Suprenaunt says, “STOP GETTING TESTED! IT’S WORTHLESS”

Why should we feel confident saying “Hey CDC, we disagree!”? Last March, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) abruptly changed how death certificates were recorded. Although this might seem like a mere formality, the CDC only made this change for one type of death — COVID-19 — and it appears that multiple federal laws were circumvented to do so. Why did the CDC decide to suddenly abandon the data collection and reporting system it had been using for 17 years without incident? And when it adopted new protocols for defining what constitutes a COVID case, why didn’t it implement safeguards to ensure that case numbers and subsequent data wouldn’t be altered by counting the same individuals over and over? Hear from an esteemed panel of experts as they dive into these questions and more on Wednesday, February 17, at 6 p.m. EST/ 3 p.m. PST. This live online event, Data Disaster: A Call for an Investigation Into the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19, https://standforhealthfreedom.com/CDC-investigation/

There have been many deaths following the COVID-19 vaccine that have been reported by medical professionals. Only a small fraction of adverse events are reported to VAERS. Yet, the CDC maintains its position that there is zero link between vaccination and deaths. Does that raise any red flags to you?

If the coronavirus vaccine causes a serious reaction, injury or death, no one will be held responsible. Under the PREP Act — passed in 2005 and invoked in March 2020 by HHS Director Alex Azar II — vaccine and drug manufacturers, government agencies, doctors and all others are free from liability from harm caused by the coronavirus vaccine. Thus, if you or a family member is harmed from the vaccine in any way, it is you who will be left with the consequences as well as the medical bills. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has shielded all pharmaceutical companies of liability from vaccine-related injuries since 1986.

It is still in the experimental stage as they have not completed Stage 3 clinical trials yet. Under the Emergency Authorization Use, it was rushed to market at warped speed, utilizing mRNA technologies that have never been used before in humans. While the Thought Police might argue that the “technology has been studied for 30 years”, it has never been studied on humans for either short-term or long-term safety concerns. There is much that’s not understood about the technology, including how it will affect your DNA and what the side effects will be over the long-term. The fact that the vaccine is experimental and has zero long-term safety data makes those who take it human guinea pigs.

Insta and FB are actively removing all posts and accounts that question the multi-billion dollar experimental biological pharmaceutical product AKA the Shirona Jab (are we going to have to start speaking in code soon?) In a series of posts, I’m going to test the Thought Police (Fact Checkers) to see what they deem as “False Information”. Clearly, the only way people will see this information is if you pass it along. Let’s have some fun with it. Are you in?

Credit to @thematrixanalyst and Alissa Smith Hayes for sharing.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission affirms the legal right of an employer to exclude the employee from the workplace even if an employee cannot get vaccinated for COVID-19 because of a disability or sincerely held religious belief and there is “no reasonable accommodation possible.” The “no reasonable accommodation” exception of employee protection gives almost any employer an out. We need specific state laws to protect employees within our state from discrimination and breach of human rights. Support Indiana’s Senate Bill 74.

Visit the link in my bio to listen to my latest podcast covering potential employer mandates surrounding the vaccine.

“Questioning and doubting the most historically corrupt and fraudulent companies in the WORLD does not make you “anti” anything. Nor does it make you a conspiracy theorist. Actually, questioning is and should be the place of reason. The fact that questioning has become taboo should, in fact, send a chill up everyone’s spine” – Anonymous

The path that leads to destruction is wide but the path that leads to life is NARROW. You might feel like you are walking alone but you may simply be on the side of TRUTH.

WHO would have guessed. Last week the World Health Organization (WHO) finally released guidance to laboratories around the world to reduce the cycle threshold in PCR testing. We’ve talked about this. A cycle threshold above 35 creates inaccurate testing, resulting in higher chances of positive COVID-19 tests. We’ve heard in the past that the World Health Organization had recommended a threshold of 37, 40 and even 45 cycles. Testing centers must now provide the CT value along with a positive result to confirm it was run at 35 cycles.


The new guidance also discusses what makes a positive test. In order to be counted as a positive test, you must now have clinical symptoms present. If there are no symptoms and you test positive, you must have another test to confirm the positive result. It would be impossible to go back and correct previous data to reflect this new guidance. With this in mind, the case numbers and death count will likely begin to decline dramatically. What are your thoughts about the WHO giving guidance to change the parameters of testing mid-pandemic without correcting previous data? Will history reflect that this statistical adjustment occured at the same time as wide-spread vaccine distribution? Any statistical analysts care to weigh in on this?